\uD83D\uDDD3 Date
\uD83D\uDC65 Participants
Lancaster: Gerard, Matt, Steven
Apologies:
Alison Packer , Alastair Dewhurst
\uD83E\uDD45 Goals
List of Epics
New tickets
Consider new functionality / items
Detailed discussion of important topics
Site report activity
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Current status of Echo Gateways / WNs testing
Recent sandbox’s for review / deployments:
Item | Presenter | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|
Vector Read updates to Echo | /wiki/spaces/GRIDPP/pages/188153912 Post-mortem to be held today | ||
Next steps for WN deployment | Move to 5.5.4-2 (core) + 5.5.4-3 (xroot-ceph-buffered):Status: lcg2268 running with that config. n_connections from xrdceph file close metrics show similar numbers compared to other nodes in 5.3.3-2 without readv No failures of lhcb jobs were observed on the test WN so far. | ||
EBUSY in readV requests | |||
Discussion on merging bufferedIO into master. | https://github.com/stfc/xrootd-ceph/pull/44 Needs testing for ‘correctness’ Also some discussion ongoing on xrootd “issues” on the xrootd-ceph sub-module: | ||
SEGV investigations with -S multi-stream flags | |||
CMSD status | - XRD-41Getting issue details... STATUS Thomas, Jyothish (STFC,RAL,SC) identified that xrdcp via the redirector using root protocol requires two “/” in the LFN to work correctly.
Assuming we want a solution which maintains backwards compatibility, we may need to explicitly add: all.export / # already existing line # add in the lines all.export cms all.export store #special cms 'namespace' # and for other pools What’s the impact? Do we need “/” export now. Should we consider the authdb file logic too ? | ||
Transfers of 0-byte files | - XRD-62Getting issue details... STATUS Observed Dune transfer failures using 0-byte files | ||
on GGUS:
Problem accessing some LHCb files at RAL
Site reports
✅ Action items
⤴ Decisions
- Gateway configuration following Option 1 is preferred: “Move to 5.5.4-2 (core) + 5.5.4-3 (xroot-ceph-buffered)”