2024-11-28 Meeting Notes

 Date

Nov 28, 2024

 Participants

 

  • @Alexander Rogovskiy

  • @James Walder

  • @Thomas Byrne

  • Lancs: Gerard, Matt, Steven

  • Glasgow: Sam

Apologies:

  • @Thomas, Jyothish (STFC,RAL,SC)

  •  

CC:

 

 

 Goals

  • List of Epics

  • New tickets

  • Consider new functionality / items

  • Detailed discussion of important topics

  • Site report activity

 

 Discussion topics

Current status of Echo Gateways / WNs testing

Recent sandbox’s for review / deployments:

 

Item

Presenter

Notes

 

Item

Presenter

Notes

 

Operational Issues
Gateways and WNs:
- Current status and upcoming changes

(Gateway Auth failures)

 

 

Upgrades of GWs this week; Main GWs complete; Alice in progress

 

AAA gateways with large numbers of connections:

image-20241128-123546.png

(gw10):
 3305 CLOSE-WAIT
37931 ESTAB

~3k ESTAB from remote hosts, 2.8k CLOSE_WAIT from remote hosts
xrd.timeout idle 60m read 10
in current config

 

cms-aaa naming convention

 

cms-aaa is the only remaining personality to use proxy/ceph as the xrootd service names


Separate naming convention would be more appropriate, to have main/supporting

(not so urgent).

CC created, but due to be reviewed December

 

 

XRootD Managers De-VMWareification

@Thomas, Jyothish (STFC,RAL,SC)

Option 2 preferred for efficiency, but Option 1 decided on

Option 1 would be simpler to implement for a temporary fix, as the move would be reversed

antares tpc nodes to be moved to an echo leafsw, to confirm ipv4 real estate with James

 

Compilation and rollout status with XrdCeph and rocky 8: 5.7.x

@Thomas, Jyothish (STFC,RAL,SC)

 

 

Shoveler

@Katy Ellis

Shoveler installation and monitoring

 

 

Deletion studies through RDR

@Ian Johnson

 

 

 

Deletions

https://stfc.atlassian.net/browse/XRD-83

 

 

XRootD Writable Workernode  Gateway Hackaton

 

@Thomas, Jyothish (STFC,RAL,SC)

XRootD Writable Workernode  Gateway Hackaton (XWWGH)

Tues 12th Nov 1600
Hackaton writeable workernode

Outcomes

 

Xrootd testing framework

 

XRootD Site Testing Framework

 

 

100 GbE Gateway testing:
SKA / Tier-1

@James Walder

https://stfc.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/UK/pages/215941180

  •  

 

UKSRC Storage Architecture

 

 

 

Tokens Status

 

  • Operational

  • Technical

  • Accounting

 

 

 

 

 

on GGUS:

Site reports

 

Lancaster: Day 2 of our mini-DC run was a bit spoilt by Ceph having a wobbly, presumably because of some sick OSDs. As Matt understands it, we hit the last little bit of backfilling backlog we had to do but rather then be a weight lifted off our cluster things “cramped up” focussing operations on a small number of PGs. (Gerard can correct me if I have the wrong end of the wrong stick). To top it off one of our OSDs keeled over physically.

We also had an (unrelated to the mini-DC, but maybe caused by a large burst of LSST jobs) a bunch of WNs had their cephfs mounts enter a horrid state, for the third time this has happened (discussed in storage yesterday and tracked to a likely bug in the kernel), from dmesg:

[Tue Nov 26 16:02:51 2024] libceph: wrong peer, want (1)10.41.12.56:6929/2269030683, got (1)10.41.12.56:6929/324345577
[Tue Nov 26 16:02:51 2024] libceph: osd435 (1)10.41.12.56:6929 wrong peer at address

Our bindfs tests were disappointing, our bonnie tests have read rates through the bind mount ~1/8th that of what we see through the regular one. Write seems less effected, and latency doesn’t appear to be impacted. Using the bindfs “multithread” option didn’t help much. Probably culprit is the tiny (and AFAICS unchangable) default bindfs blocksize But these were noddy bonnie tests, and maybe this is the wrong tool? Would noddy dd be better?

 

Glasgow

 

 Action items

How to replace the original functionality of fstream monitoring, now opensearch has replaced existing solutions.

 

  •  

  •  

 

 Decisions